Weekly Analysis Roundup: Excessive- vs. Low-Bar Squats, Synthetic Sweeteners and Weight Loss, Ginseng Doesn’t Increase Testosterone, and Extra


Share post:

It’s estimated that there are over 2+ million scientific papers printed every year, and this firehose solely appears to accentuate.

Even when you slender your focus to health analysis, it could take a number of lifetimes to unravel the hairball of research on diet, coaching, supplementation, and associated fields.

Because of this my staff and I spend hundreds of hours every year dissecting and describing scientific research in articles, podcasts, and books and utilizing the outcomes to formulate our 100% all-natural sports activities dietary supplements and inform our teaching providers. 

And whereas the rules of correct consuming and exercising are easy and considerably immutable, reviewing new analysis can reinforce or reshape how we eat, practice, and dwell for the higher. 

Thus, every week, I’m going to share 5 scientific research on food plan, train, supplementation, mindset, and life-style that may enable you to acquire muscle and power, lose fats, carry out and really feel higher, dwell longer, and get and keep more healthy. 

This week, you’ll study whether or not high- or low-bar squats are higher for gaining muscle and power, how synthetic sweeteners have an effect on weight reduction, whether or not ginseng will increase testosterone ranges, and extra. 

There’s little distinction between high- and low-bar squats, so do whichever you favor.

Supply: “A Biomechanical Comparability of the Security-Bar, Excessive-Bar and Low-Bar Squat across the Sticking Area amongst Recreationally Resistance-Skilled Males and Girls” printed on August 6, 2021 in Worldwide Journal of Environmental Analysis and Public Well being.

There are two methods to again squat: Excessive bar and low bar. Within the high-bar squat, the bar rests in your higher traps, and within the low-bar squat, your mid traps and rear delts

This delicate distinction has spawned numerous Web kerfuffles, with zealots on each side throwing round all method of health cant to justify their stance. This examine performed by scientists at Nord College suggests this brouhaha is a lot sizzling air.

The researchers had 14 recreationally educated people carry out a three-rep max (three reps with as a lot weight as doable) with three completely different squat types: high-bar, low-bar, and security bar squat

Whereas the lifters carried out the workout routines, the researchers took a raft of measurements, together with three-rep max weight, bar velocity at completely different elements of the train, joint angles and moments, and muscle activation of the spinal erectors, glutes, quads, hip adductors, hamstrings, and calves.

The outcomes confirmed that joint angles differed barely between squat types, with the principle distinction being that weightlifters leaned additional ahead within the low-bar squat and stayed extra upright within the high-bar squat.

When it comes to weight lifted, the contributors had the strongest three-rep max on the low-bar squat (214 lb/97 kg), with the high-bar squat coming in second (205 lb/93 kg), and the safety-bar squat coming in third (200 lb/91 kg). The glutes had been additionally a tad extra lively in the course of the security bar squat than the high- or low-bar variations, although which will simply be statistical noise.

Apart from these (minor) variations, the outcomes had been an identical with all three workout routines.

In different phrases, it doesn’t matter which type of squatting you employ—do no matter you discover most comfy. 

That stated, there are a couple of conditions that tilt the scales in favor of 1 variation or one other. If you happen to’re working round a lower-back damage, for example, you might wish to pigeonhole low-bar squats and follow high-bar or security bar squats till your again heals (low-bar squatting forces you to lean farther ahead, placing extra stress in your decrease again). As I’ve written about earlier than, there are most likely advantages to rotating between completely different workout routines each few months (together with squats), which is how I designed my exercise packages for males and ladies

If you happen to squat a number of occasions per week, you could possibly additionally use completely different variations on completely different days (high-bar on Mondays and low-bar on Thursdays, for example). 

(And when you’d like much more particular recommendation about what workout routines you must do, how typically you must practice, and for what number of units and reps you must do to succeed in your well being and health targets, take the Legion Energy Coaching Quiz, and in lower than a minute, you’ll get a totally personalised power coaching program. Click on right here to test it out.)

TL;DR: There’s little distinction between high- and low-bar squats. Do whichever squat type you favor, or rotate by way of a number of variations in your program.

Discover the Excellent Dietary supplements for You in Simply 60 Seconds

You do not want dietary supplements to construct muscle, lose fats, and get wholesome. However the precise ones may help. Take this quiz to study which of them are greatest for you.

Take the Quiz

Boosting your each day step rely makes your cardio exercises simpler.

Supply: “The Impact of Cardio Coaching and Rising Nonexercise Bodily Exercise on Cardiometabolic Threat Elements” printed on October 1, 2021 in Medication & Science in Sports activities & Train.

I’ve beforehand coated how strolling helps you keep wholesome and dwell longer, however in keeping with the outcomes of this examine performed by scientists at East Carolina College, it may additionally have an effect on how properly you reply to common, formal train.

The researchers randomly cut up 45 middle-aged overweight individuals into three teams. One walked on an incline treadmill for 40-to-50 minutes at a mean coronary heart fee of 125-to-130 beats per minute (a brisk stroll) 3-to-4 occasions per week for six months, one did the identical program and likewise elevated their each day step rely by ~3,000 steps per day (exterior of their structured exercises), and the final group had the privilege of sitting on their butts being the management.

At first of the examine, the entire contributors averaged 4,000-to-5,000 steps per day, which suggests the group who aimed to extend their each day step rely was doing ~7,000-to-8,000 steps per day exterior of their incline strolling exercises. The researchers measured the contributors’ physique weight and waist circumference and did blood exams to measure a number of well being markers equivalent to ldl cholesterol, insulin, and glucose ranges firstly and finish of this system.

Unsurprisingly, the outcomes confirmed that individuals who had been probably the most bodily lively misplaced extra weight and improved their well being and health greater than the group that didn’t train. What’s fascinating, although, is how significantly better the group did that boosted their regular step rely.

Those that did simply 3,000 extra steps per day misplaced about twice as a lot weight (~2 lb vs. ~4 lb), decreased their waist circumference by twice as a lot (~1 in vs. ~2 in), misplaced extra physique fats (~1% vs. ~3%), decreased complete ldl cholesterol over twice as a lot (-5.4 mgdL vs. -12.3 mgdL), and improved a number of measures of cardiovascular health and metabolic well being in comparison with those that solely accomplished the strolling exercises. 

All from strolling about half-hour extra per day. 

Now, you is perhaps pondering, aren’t these advantages from simply figuring out extra? 

Sure and no. Whereas exercising extra is clearly going that can assist you get fitter sooner, what’s fascinating is the diploma to which the additional steps helped. Though they solely did about 30-to-40% extra work, they noticed a 50+% enchancment in outcomes (and keep in mind that the additional steps had been largely from very low-intensity pottering round, not strolling up an incline like of their common cardio exercises).

Now, there are a couple of methodological quibbles value noting. Most significantly, the variations didn’t attain statistical significance apart from cardiovascular health. That stated, given the robust development in favor of the extra-steps group, it’s affordable to conclude that there was some substantive profit (even when it wasn’t statistically spectacular). 

Second, when you exclude people who didn’t follow the protocol all through the examine, then the outcomes would most likely look much more spectacular for the extra-steps group (no shock—extra work, extra positive factors). 

Lastly, you could possibly additionally say that absolutely the positive factors weren’t all that nice both, particularly after 6 months (additionally not shocking contemplating they didn’t change their diets). 

To me, crucial factor about this examine is that it’s but extra proof pointing to the outsize worth of even seemingly “trivial” quantities of train. As I coated final week and in earlier articles, even brief, rare exercises yield huge dividends. 

Anywho, when you weren’t bought on strolling earlier than, recant your heretical methods and begin legging it extra typically. 

TL;DR: Individuals who elevated their each day step rely by ~3,000 steps along with doing 3-to-4 structured cardio exercises per week skilled disproportionately giant enhancements in physique composition, cardiovascular health, and metabolic well being in comparison with individuals who solely did cardio. 

Discover the Finest Weight loss program for You in Simply 60 Seconds

What number of energy do you have to eat? What about “macros?” What meals do you have to eat? Take our 60-second quiz to get science-based solutions to those questions and extra.

Take the Quiz

There’s just one “proper” strategy to phrase your weightlifting cues, and most of the people aren’t doing it. 

Supply: “Acute and Lengthy-Time period Results of Attentional Focus Methods on Muscular Energy: A Meta-Evaluation” printed on November 12, 2021 in Sports activities (Basel).

A weightlifting cue is a psychological mantra you recite throughout train that pulls your consideration to a selected facet of your kind. 

For instance, “squeeze the bar” is a standard weightlifting cue for bettering your bench press, because it encourages you to take care of higher physique tightness and aggressively drive the bar upward.

You possibly can divide weightlifting cues into two classes: Inside cues and exterior cues. Inside cues direct your consideration towards what you’re doing along with your physique (e.g. “hips up” within the squat), and exterior cues direct your consideration towards how your actions impression an object in your atmosphere (e.g. “push the ground away” within the deadlift).

Researchers—spearheaded by Dr. Gabriele Wulf—have confirmed many occasions over that exterior cues are superior to inner ones for bettering efficiency in mainly each sport possible. For instance, exterior cues enhance endurance, steadiness, agility, coordination, velocity, motion effectivity, and throwing, kicking, and golf shot accuracy.

Most of those research have centered on skill-based sports activities, and whereas one examine confirmed that inner cues are about nearly as good as exterior ones for bettering leg extension efficiency (yawn), no researchers have rigorously examined how interval versus exterior cues impression weightlifting efficiency . . . till now. 

On this evaluate, the researchers combed by way of the outcomes of seven research and located that exterior cues enhance power considerably greater than inner cues on the entire. A number of the research measured obscure kinds of power equivalent to grip power and finger power, which aren’t essentially relevant to weightlifters (researchers should work with what they’ve), however others confirmed that exterior cues additionally boosted power in additional related methods equivalent to on workout routines just like the squat, deadlift, and mid-thigh pull

Most significantly, when the researchers checked out long-term knowledge, they discovered that those that used exterior cues tended to achieve extra power over time (significantly lower-body power) than those that didn’t.

In different phrases, you don’t must spend a decade finding out to turn out to be a Bene Gesserit priest to interpret these outcomes: if you wish to get as robust as doable on mainly any train, or higher at any sport, use exterior cues as a substitute of inner ones. 

For a catalog of my favourite cues, try this text:

Full Checklist of Weightlifting Cues for Excellent Kind & New PRs

Oh, and if the cues you fancy occur to be inner ones, you may tweak them to be exterior. “Preserve your again straight” within the squat turns into “push your shoulders into the ceiling,” for example.

Some individuals attempt to push again towards this analysis by citing private anecdotes or examples of completed athletes preferring inner cues, however what you normally discover is that these people went from no cues to inner cues, which is clearly going to provide higher outcomes. That stated, science reveals exterior ones are nonetheless mo bettah. 

TL;DR: Exterior weightlifting cues (“break the bar in half”) will enable you to get stronger than inner ones (“squeeze your pecs”).

Synthetic sweeteners enhance weight reduction . . . make you acquire weight . . . or perhaps do nothing?

Supply: “Results of Nonnutritive Sweeteners on Physique Weight and BMI in Numerous Scientific Contexts: Systematic Evaluation and Meta-Evaluation” printed on March 25, 2020 in Weight problems Critiques.

Weight reduction in the end boils all the way down to energy in versus energy out

Meals and drinks which are sweetened with sugar are usually actually excessive in energy (150 per 12 oz for many sodas and power drinks). 

Meals and drinks sweetened with non-nutritive synthetic sweeteners are usually a lot decrease in energy. 

Ergo, concordantly, vis-a-vis, consuming artificially-sweetened fare ought to enable you to drop a few pounds, proper? 

In all probability, however the analysis is so much muddier than you would possibly count on. 

Some research present that individuals who eat artificially-sweetened meals and drinks lose extra weight, and others present people who devour extra of those meals are literally extra prone to be overweight than those that don’t. 

To assist lower this Gordian knot, researchers at Marista College of Mérida performed a meta-analysis of 20 research that concerned a complete of two,914 contributors and that lasted not less than a month every. 

They discovered that individuals who consumed artificially-sweetened meals and drinks misplaced extra weight (about 3 lb) and noticed a better lower in physique mass index (BMI) than individuals who didn’t. 

When the researchers dug deeper into the outcomes, what they discovered was pleasingly according to frequent sense: In and of themselves, synthetic sweeteners have mainly no impression on weight reduction. They aren’t fats loss dietary supplements, in any case.

The place they may help, although, is when you’re changing caloric sweeteners like sucrose or high-fructose corn syrup and never monitoring energy, because you’re nearly assured to subconsciously devour fewer energy. 

On the subject of weight reduction, then, synthetic sweeteners are largely benign.  

That stated, I’m typically not a fan of wanton consumption of synthetic sweeteners for 2 causes: 

  • Whereas the destructive well being results are sometimes exaggerated, there’s nonetheless some concern about what impression they could have long-term and there are protected, pure alternate options that style simply nearly as good.
  • You can additionally argue that synthetic sweeteners nonetheless gas our hedonistic impulses to devour sweet-tasting meals. Whereas it could be a stretch (and scientifically inaccurate) to say that synthetic sweeteners encourage overeating calorific sweets, it’s plain that some individuals get weirdly hooked up to them and devour them in absurdly giant portions, and it’s most likely sensible to be cautious of unhinged consumption of something. 

And that’s why I don’t put synthetic sweeteners in any of Legion’s merchandise. It’s most likely wonderful to devour them in small quantities (a couple of items of sugar-free gum aren’t gonna kill you), however I choose to play it protected and follow all-natural sweeteners more often than not.

Circling again to the examine at hand, although, if we’re purely speaking about weight reduction, synthetic sweeteners are simply a straightforward strategy to scale back your calorie consumption when you at present eat a whole lot of sugary meals. Nothing extra, nothing much less.

TL;DR: Artificially sweetened meals and drinks aren’t inherently “good” or “unhealthy” for weight reduction—they simply enable you to eat fewer energy (though there are pure alternate options).

Some Nutritionists Cost Tons of of {Dollars} for This Weight loss program “Hack” . . .

. . . and it is yours without spending a dime. Take our 60-second quiz and study precisely what number of energy you must eat, what your “macros” needs to be, what meals are greatest for you, and extra.

Take the Quiz

Ginseng doesn’t enhance testosterone.

Supply: “The Impact of Ginseng Supplementation on Anabolic Index, Muscle Energy, Physique Composition, and Testosterone and Cortisol Response to Acute Resistance Train in Male Bodybuilders” printed on March 6, 2021 in Science & Sports activities.

A few years in the past, a examine performed by scientists on the College of Edinburgh discovered that ladies skilled a rise in testosterone and DHEA (a precursor to testosterone) once they consumed 75 mg of purple Korean ginseng for per week.

This was “exploratory analysis,” which suggests it was meant to simply scratch the floor of a brand new subject and assist researchers work out what questions to check subsequent. So in fact complement firms touted it as definitive sCiEnTaStIc proof that ginseng gooses vitamin T and offers you whale boners and helps you pack on muscle sooner than a roided hornet.

Some foolish scientists from Islamic Azad College needed to study whether or not, you realize, any of this was even remotely true, and they also performed a examine to find out whether or not ginseng might enhance testosterone ranges in male bodybuilders.

The researchers randomly cut up 20 male “pure” (drug-freeish) bodybuilders into two teams: A ginseng group and a placebo group. Each teams took two capsules twice each day. The one distinction was that the ginseng group’s capsules contained 250 mg of ginseng, whereas the placebo group’s capsules had been full of two strains of coke lower with Drano® (simply kidding, it was glucose powder).

All through the 6-week examine, the contributors continued to eat their common food plan and adopted a 3-day upper-body power coaching program.

At first and finish of the examine, the researchers measured the contributors’ BMI, waist-to-hip ratio, resting testosterone and cortisol ranges, testosterone-to-cortisol ratio, and estimated bench and leg press one-rep max.

The outcomes confirmed that supplementing with ginseng had no impact on physique composition, power, or hormone ranges. Though individuals who took ginseng had ever-so-slightly increased testosterone ranges post-workout, the distinction was so small that it wouldn’t be sufficient to have an effect on long-term muscle and power acquire.

The outcomes of this examine shouldn’t be shocking when you’ve been following my work for any size of time, however I feel it’s vital to dig up useless horses and provides them a couple of whacks every now and then. Weak, preliminary, unreplicated research just like the one which kicked off this line of inquiry are fodder for unscrupulous capsule and powder pushers, which is why it’s value analyzing the stronger, extra mature, replicable research that always refute their advertising and marketing claims however are not often talked about.

Apart from injecting some #dedication each week, there’s no complement that reliably boosts testosterone ranges. Till scientists uncover one thing that does, the most effective methods to maintain T ranges topped off are to get loads of sleep, reduce and handle stress, preserve a wholesome weight, eat a balanced food plan, raise weights, and permit your physique time to get well from coaching.

(And when you really feel confused about what dietary supplements you must take to succeed in your well being and health targets, take the Legion Complement Finder Quiz, and in lower than a minute, you’ll know precisely what dietary supplements are best for you. Click on right here to test it out.)

TL;DR: Like each different purported “testosterone booster,” ginseng doesn’t really enhance testosterone, power, muscle progress, or fats loss.

Analysis reveals utilizing exterior weightlifting cues (“break the bar in half”) will enable you to get stronger than utilizing inner ones (“squeeze your pecs”): https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34822352/


A weightlifting cue is a psychological mantra you recite throughout train that pulls your consideration to a selected facet of your kind. You possibly can divide weightlifting cues into two classes: Inside cues and exterior cues.

Inside cues direct your consideration towards what you’re doing along with your physique (e.g. “hips up” within the squat), and exterior cues direct your consideration towards how your actions impression an object in your atmosphere (e.g. “push the ground away” within the deadlift).

We’ve recognized for a while that exterior cues are superior to inner cues for bettering efficiency in mainly each sport, however it wasn’t till lately that we discovered how they impression weightlifting efficiency.

In a evaluate of seven research, researchers discovered that exterior cues enhance power considerably greater than inner cues (together with on workout routines just like the squat and deadlift), and those that used exterior cues have a tendency to achieve extra power over time than those that don’t: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34822352/ 

+ Scientific References


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Related articles