How open supply innovation can mitigate digital well being inequities


Share post:

The COVID-19 pandemic compelled many sufferers and suppliers to make the most of telehealth and different digital strategies of delivering care. However not everybody was capable of swap to telehealth in 2020. Most cancers screenings and outpatient visits decreased, leaving a few of the most weak and underserved communities with out entry to care.

“We have to actually be much more intentional and purposeful with how we outline what well being fairness means within the context of digital well being,” Dr. Keisuke Nakagawa, director of innovation at UC Davis Well being’s Digital CoLab and government director of its new Cloud Innovation Lab, mentioned at HIMSS22. 

“I do not need us to be essentially vetted to 1 definition, but additionally be very aware about at any given cut-off date in our know-how, who’re the sufferers which can be getting left behind? Who’re the clinicians which can be getting left behind? And I truly need to broaden that definition. What are the well being programs which can be additionally getting left behind?”

Nakagawa argues that innovation in healthcare is pushed by mental property. For instance, at a tutorial medical middle like UC Davis Well being, college have IP the well being system can license out. However that is not as conducive to innovation as open supply software program, extra widespread to the tech trade. 

“We do not have a Stack Overflow for healthcare. Think about if that kind of tradition existed, sharing and open innovation. In the end, in healthcare, it is also very aggressive, and it is not scalable,” he mentioned.

The Cloud Innovation Lab, constructed on a partnership with Amazon Net Companies, is in search of submissions on digital fairness issues, and can publish outcomes as open supply for others to make use of and replace. 

Shilpa Vadodaria, worldwide innovation lead for well being fairness at Amazon, mentioned the tech and retail large’s mannequin for innovation begins with imagining a perfect future state – with out getting caught on all of the hurdles that should be overcome – and dealing backwards. 

“What if affected person prices got here all the way down to zero? What if the healthcare system is designed round a Black, trans, disabled girl? As a result of proper now we all know that isn’t who’s centered,” she mentioned. “So these are the forms of main, large ‘what if’ questions that we need to carry to the middle of the dialog round digital well being fairness.”

The method can also be consumer-centered, specializing in starting with questions like: Who’s the client? What’s the alternative for that buyer? How have you learnt what prospects want or need? What’s the buyer expertise?

“The method of working backwards will not be about documenting what you already know you need to go all in on. It is about what are your gnarly downside areas that you do not even have an answer for, that you don’t also have a potential buyer recognized,” Vadodaria mentioned. 

The lab will formally launch in September.

“I really feel like in drugs, we’re simply consistently dashing from one affected person to the following. There’s codes you may’t actually take the time to actually study, and research, and perceive as a lot as reacting with the information that you’ve,” Nakagawa mentioned. “However in innovation, we now have that point. Simply take a step again. We utterly method each single downside from a newbie’s thoughts.”

Supply hyperlink


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here


Related articles